With all the benefits that digital filmmaking offers, it’s easy to forget the magic and artistry of traditional film. However, we assure you that we understand the many reasons why people choose to use digital for filming with a camera. From affordability to practicality, digital technology has undoubtedly revolutionized the world of filmmaking. Nevertheless, it’s crucial to remember that film is not meant to be practical. Many of today’s filmmakers, and even some of the more experienced ones, have overlooked the importance of using traditional film in their work. So today, we’ll be exploring the unique qualities of celluloid film and why it’s essential to keep its art alive in the modern era of cinema.
The many benefits of digital film-making are common knowledge. It’s a lot more affordable. It’s much more practical. It provides for simple, quick fixes to errors. It’s a huge time-saver for everyone in the Camera Department. While digital has opened up incredible possibilities for amateur and rookie filmmakers, many of today’s filmmakers (and some of the older ones) have forgotten that film is not meant to be practical.
If that were the case, no one would have bothered to figure out how to make the camera move—which begs the question, why cameras aren’t still fixed in place. Everything you need to show can still be shown in a single frame, you just have to choreograph the blocking appropriately. The invention of camera movement was made to enrich the cinematic language. Indeed, all subsequent innovations in film and film equipment were invented for the same reason, at least up to the time where some cunning individuals spotted the possibility to do the same for commercial rather than artistic reasons.
While it’s true that digital has its practical uses, movies (and other forms of art) were never meant to be about function. It was meant to have symbolic value and aesthetic appeal. The goal was to give them a new perspective on familiar objects.
While there is no denying digital’s convenience, cinema has never been about utility. It was meant to have symbolic value and aesthetic appeal.
George Méliès and D. W. Griffith are often cited as forefathers of the film industry since they were among the first to use the then-recently invented motion picture camera for storytelling and drama. Sergei Eisenstein figured out the language of cinema editing a few years later. One of the best and most significant movies ever made, Fritz Lang’s Metropolis premiered in 1927. A new artistic medium, film, was created. Its origins can be traced back to a sliver of celluloid.
Artistic motion pictures first appeared on celluloid.
Anyone who has ever loaded a roll of analog film into a camera will attest to how fragile and difficult it is to work with. Mastery, expertise, and specialized knowledge are needed. In other words, becoming an expert with analog film is an artistic endeavor in and of itself. It’s also a science in its own right. In the past, it was impossible to predict how a product will look once development was complete. It was all dependent on the film stock used and the cinematographer’s abilities. A cinematographer’s ability to expose, tweak, and stylize a scene depended on his or her familiarity with the film stock being used. The finished product can be viewed in real time on a mobile device and even paused and rewound. Years of study and effort went into making a cinematographer a master of both theory and technique before digital took over the film industry.
However, texture is arguably the most noticeable thing missing from digitally produced films. Film is a physical medium, while the final outcome of digital filmmaking is purely virtual. Film photography imparts a textured quality to the final product that is lost in digital capture.
Permit me to wax mushy for a second and say that watching a film filmed in analog on a large screen is one of life’s greatest pleasures. If you don’t think I’m telling the truth, all you have to do is watch The Searchers, a film by John Ford. See the film in the dark, on the big screen, and then tell me you don’t feel the grain of the image and see the most gorgeous, brilliant, and alive colors on a screen. You have my challenge. And if you really want to be blown away by visual splendor, I recommend seeing any film shot in three-strip Technicolor.
Because of film’s inherent feeling of texture, analog filmmaking has a tangible quality that digital lacks. It’s reliable in terms of substance. It’s worth pointing out that several contemporary movies “mimic” the authentic cinema look and feel with CGI. Typically, this entails giving the digitally shot film a “grainy” appearance. Obviously, this “cheap trick” can never replicate the look and feel of a film shot in analog.
I’m sure I’ll upset some people by saying this, but a passion for cinema naturally leads one to appreciate movies. For nearly a century, cinema has relied solely on analog film, making analog-shot film the purest and most genuine form of cinema.
A passion for movies and film goes hand in hand.
No, We do not think we should abandon digital filmmaking. Quite the opposite, in fact. We already mentioned how helpful digital filmmaking can be, especially for newcomers to the industry. The beauty of film is essential to appreciating the splendor of cinema. You can’t separate the two.
Cinema’s aesthetic value is intrinsically linked to that of film, and vice versa.
Analog film is a fine art that is fundamental to the concept of cinema, and to dismiss it as “impractical” or “outdated” is to do just that.
Teaching and promoting the use of analog cameras is a must. If you don’t appreciate cinema in its purest form, you won’t be able to appreciate all the value and magnificence film has to offer.
Don’t forget to like and subscribe and follow along our cinematic journey.
